By Molly Ball
Feb 27 2013
From voter polarization to campaign ads, a political scientist calls out the mistaken notions commonly perpetuated by election commentators.
If following the 2012 presidential election sometimes made you want to scream at your television, imagine how political scientists felt.
As they watched, helpless, the pundits paraded across their screens, spouting theories about the way politics works that academics know to be wrong. In the words of Morris Fiorina, a political scientist at Stanford: "Like all election seasons, the 2012 campaign was rich in commentary that was at odds with or unsupported by findings from political science."
Fiorina is the author of a recent article published in The Forum, a political-research quarterly, that seeks to dismantle some of the most widespread misconceptions.If you're a pundit, someone who loves a pundit, or a cable-news viewer who enjoys feeling smarter than the people you see on TV, here's what you can learn from Fiorina's analysis.
Continue at:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/02/5-false-assumptions-political-pundits-make-all-the-time/273544/?google_editors_picks=true
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.